Determining of genetic affinity and divergence of some local cultivars of zea mays grown under water stress conditions
Published 2026-06-29
Keywords
- ahb2,
- maize,
- drought tolerance,
- gene expression
Copyright (c) 2026 Hiba H. Taha, Rayan Faisal, Najwa I. Al-Barhawee, Raed S. Alsaffar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
Abstract
Three varieties of corn seeds (local, Sudanese, and Spanish) were studies for their pattern of ahb2 expression under three periods of water stress conditions. Our findings indicated that the ahb2 gene in corn exhibits a pronounced response to water stress, but in a manner contingent upon genotype. In both the local and Spanish cultivars, ahb2 expression exhibited a non-linear trajectory, characterized by an initial upregulation at one week, suppression at ten days, and a pronounced induction by two weeks. This dynamic profile indicates that ahb2 may be involved in early signaling, mid-phase metabolic adaptation, and late-stage stress resilience processes. The substantial late induction, however, seems to contradict functional investigations that showed CRISPR knockout lines of ahb2 were more drought-resistant and lost less water than the wild type. This suggests that prolonged or delayed overexpression of ahb2 may be detrimental to drought survival, presumably by delaying stomatal closure. The Sudanese type, on the other hand, showed a steady decrease in ahb2 levels as the drought progressed. This pattern is more in line with better drought adaptability. Such inhibition may augment ABA buildup, facilitate stomatal closure, and initiate stress-adaptive signaling pathways, mirroring the phenotype of knockout plants. These data demonstrate that several maize genotypes control ahb2 in varied manners, indicative of unique drought response strategies. The non-linear expression seen in certain kinds may indicate stress intensity limits or circadian/physiological regulation, whereas gradual suppression corresponds more closely with adaptive drought tolerance mechanisms. In general, our work shows that ahb2 is an important regulator whose expression pattern during drought may affect the balance between sensitivity and tolerance in maize.
References
- Adebayo M.A., Menkir A. (2015). Combining ability of adapted and exotic drought-tolerant maize inbred lines under full irrigation and rainfed conditions in Nigeria. J. Crop Improv, 29, 117–130.
- Barbosa, P.A.M., Fritsche-Neto, R., Andrade, M. C., Petroli, C.D., Burgueño, J., Galli, G. (2021). Introgression of maize diversity for drought tolerance: Subtropical maize landraces as source of new positive variants. Front. Plant Sci, 12, 691211.
- FAO (2021). The Impact of Disasters and Crises on Agriculture and Food Security. Rome: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.
- Fujii, H., Zhu, J-K. (2012). Osmotic stress signaling via protein kinases. Cell Mol Life Sci, 69(19), 3165–73.
- Hu, H. (2022). Transcriptional regulation in plant drought tolerance: Recent advances and future prospects. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 20(7), 1285–1307.
- Liu, S., Li, C., Wang, H., Wang, S., Yang, S., Liu, X., Qin, F. (2020). Mapping regulatory variants controlling gene expression in drought response and tolerance in maize. Genome biology, 21, 1-22.
- Liu, S., Wang, H., Qin, F. (2023a). Genetic dissection of drought resistance for trait improvement in crops. The Crop Journal, 11(4), 975-985.
- Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Zhang, C., Guo, J., Liu, Q., Yin, Y., Liu, X. (2023b). Gene editing of ZmGA20ox3 improves plant architecture and drought tolerance in maize. Plant Cell Reports, 43(1), 18.
- Lunduka, R.W., Mateva, K. I., Magorokosho, C., Manjeru, P. (2017). Impact of adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties on total maize production in south Eastern Zimbabwe. Clim. Dev., 11, 35–46.
- McMillen, M.S., Mahama, A.A., Sibiya, J., Lübberstedt, T., Suza, W.P. (2022). Improving drought tolerance in maize: Tools and techniques. Front Genet, 13,1001001.
- Messina C., McDonald D., Poffenberger H., Clark R., Salinas A., Fang Y. (2021). Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize. J. Exp. Bot., 72, 5235–5245.
- Raza, A., Razzaq, A., Mehmood, S. S., Zou, X., Zhang, X., Lv, Y. (2019). Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review. Plants, 8(2), 34.
- Sheoran, S., Kaur, Y., Kumar, S., Shukla, S., Rakshit, S., Kumar, R. (2022). Recent advances for drought stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.): Present status and future prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 872566.
- Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2007). Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2), 221–227.
- Tang, H., Zhang, L., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Liu, C. (2025). Resilience of Maize to Environmental Stress: Insights into Drought and Heat Tolerance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(11), 5274.
- Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, Kumar V, Verma R, Upadhyay RG, Pandey M, Sharma S. (2017). Abscisic Acid Signaling and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: A Review on Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Front Plant Sci, 20,8,161.
- Wang, B., Liu, C., Zhang, D., He, C., Zhang, J., Li, Z. (2019). Effects of maize organ-specific drought stress response on yields from transcriptome analysis. BMC Plant Biol, 1,19(1), 335.
- Zhu, J.K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167(2), 313–24.