Reviewer Guidelines

Peer review is a cornerstone of the editorial process in the Journal of Life and Bio-sciences Research (JLBSR). As a reviewer, your critical insights help ensure the integrity, accuracy, and relevance of the manuscripts we publish. The role involves assessing the validity of the research methods, identifying any flaws or ethical concerns, and confirming whether the conclusions are supported by the presented evidence and literature.

1. Before Accepting a Review Invitation

We greatly appreciate your willingness to serve as a peer reviewer. Before accepting an invitation, please consider the following:

2. Purpose and Process of Peer Review

Peer review is essential to uphold the scientific rigor and integrity of the JLBSR. Each manuscript will be subjected to a double-blind peer review by at least two independent experts. The primary goals of the review are:

Reviewer comments are anonymized and shared with the authors. In cases of major revisions, you may be asked to re-evaluate the revised version.

Review Workflow and Transparency

Review Model: JLBSR follows a double-blind peer review process. Both the reviewer and author identities are concealed throughout the review process to ensure objectivity and fairness.

Peer Review Workflow

  1. Submitted manuscripts undergo initial screening by the editorial office for scope, formatting, and ethics compliance.
  2. Manuscripts that meet initial requirements are assigned to at least two qualified independent reviewers.
  3. Reviewers evaluate based on originality, methodology, clarity, significance, and relevance to the field.
  4. Editors make a final decision (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject) based on reviewer feedback.

Typical Timeline

Reviewer Selection and Ethics

Reviewers are selected based on disciplinary expertise, past reviewing quality, and scholarly credentials. Reviewers are expected to adhere to the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

 

3. Structuring Your Review Report

JLBSR does not mandate a fixed structure, but the following format is strongly encouraged:

You are encouraged to:

If you have comments intended solely for the Editor, please include them in the confidential section of your report.

4. Key Review Criteria

When evaluating a manuscript, please consider:

5. Confidentiality and Ethics

Reviewers must treat all submissions as strictly confidential:

6. Conflicts of Interest

Please decline to review if:

7. Additional Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

8. Joining Our Reviewer Community

If you are interested in becoming a regular reviewer of JLBSR, we welcome your application. Please register for a reviewer account and ensure your contact details and subject expertise are updated. Our Editorial Board selects reviewers based on the topic and scientific background of the manuscript.